Actually Twilight Sparkle has a tendancy for this, maybe what makes her flaws kind of depthful. She has something of a one track mind that is too set on accomplishing one goal she doesn't notice the other risks or scenarios happening around her. In Lesson Zero for example the moral is about being so overfocused on one particular task and not seeing the big picture.
1. She obsessively tries to even out the icing on the cupcakes despite them all being reduced to a tiny spec on top in the process.
2. When trying to make the CMC grow attached to her doll, she is so obsessed with making them argue over loving it, she fails to realise they are actually fighting over who should be forced to play with it first anyway.
True, true. Add to that 3. Twilight visits Fluttershy to see if she needs help with being more courageous or assertive or something along those lines. She sees FS (apparently) brutalizing an adult bear, and concludes that she doesn't need any help—completely ignoring the fact that FS could (apparently) use some help dealing with her
homicidal rage.
edited 12th Jun '12 8:47:41 PM by MetaFour
...they feed my nightmares and starve my dreams.
iirc, Back when the episode aired, wasn't the main problem people had with it that RD's decision to pick Tank felt like a forced aesop?
I once tried to get kids to play Calvinball with me at recess. Nobody wanted to play with me, though, so I just played by myself. It's more than possible, let me tell you.
@Kyler but her barreling into this whilst showing NO regard for those kinds of things is thoughtless.
..forgive me if I was concerned for the lives of these guys
"Contests fought between two masters are decided instantly. An invisible battle is now raging between the two of them." Lulu vs Schneizel
@con I ain't interested in comedy right now.
"Contests fought between two masters are decided instantly. An invisible battle is now raging between the two of them." Lulu vs Schneizel
Think about it this way. RD does some pretty nutty things. Pretty sure more dangerous stuff than that gorge. Those pets knew what they where getting themselves into.
Everything's been done. Everything has a meaning. However your life at best is to serve as a building block for others.
Or to be clearer, it's a game where you make up the rules as you go along.
The score can be oogie to boogie, for one thing.
Tick Tock, goes the clock/ He cradled and he rocked her/ Tick Tock, goes the clock/Till River kills the Doctor.
Here's a question: How do you propose Rainbow Dash filter out the contestants that were just being overconfident, or were being pressured to participate?
Can you tell me who you are? Can you tell me where I am?
I've forgotten how to see. I've forgotten if I can.
On the issue of Hobbes being real, I recall Watterson stating (in the 10th Anniversary book) that Calvin believes Hobbes is real; everyone else believes that Hobbes is just a stuffed animal; and
neither perspective is supposed to be right or wrong. Rather postmodern there.
So that one story arc where Hobbes tied Calvin up—and Calvin couldn't get out without his dad's help—was something of a misstep on Watterson's part, rather than him intentionally providing evidence that Hobbes was really real.
...they feed my nightmares and starve my dreams.
@con Why? Why would I like it?
I don't know. Why would you like a show for little girls?
On the gorge race thing; we can talk about the idea of them being pressured into following pack tactics, but we shouldn't forget that some of them did, in fact, drop out. And not a word was spent pressuring them for their choice. The rest of them could clearly see that it was a choice that they could make. Some of them felt ready, some of them didn't, and all who did made it through.
edited 12th Jun '12 8:57:39 PM by Enlong
I have a message from another time...
I never cared to ever see that. It always looked boring.
It's actually pretty good.
Life is simple: it has no nontrivial normal subgroups.