@Ginger:
If we were the show's primary targets, then yes, I might expect Evilestia to be a viable possibility. But regardless of the depth of characterization, worldbuilding goodness, and Lauren Faustitude, you have to consider the
real target audience and, to perhaps a greater extent, the series' tone so far. The brilliant, beautiful alicorn princess isn't going to turn out to be an oppressive, power-hungry tyrant.
Now, Trollestia I support. She's proven that she likes to be mischievous in the past, to the point of introducing the mane cast to Canterlot's
hoi polloi for the sole purpose of shaking them up (if not quite to the extent they ended up, but...), after all.
Anyway, I'm gonna take a second to address something tangentially related I've been thinking about for a while. This isn't directed at you, Ginger, your comment just provides a nice jumping-off point.
I was at Connecticon over the weekend, and there was a panel on FiM there that struck me as rather alarmist. It predicted that the series will eventually fall into a morass of fandom nods and brony trolling because that's what the fanbase wants, or something similar to that argument, and that it will eventually lose all its refreshingness and... well, not really 'innocence', but... soul, perhaps. I have to emphatically disagree. I won't deny that there are a lot of fans who'd like to see the show with more of an
edge; but I have to say that I don't understand that
at all. The show's appeal is in its... damn, again I can't say 'innocence'. It's clear-eyed, perhaps, is what I want to say. Not cynical at all. Cynicism goes against a lot of what it stands for (aside from selling toys, that is, in a massive ironic blow to my argument), so if the show does lose its soul, it'll be in the other direction - sanitized, not cynicized, if I'm allowed to be twee.
...Moving on. JTeeth, answer me honestly: am I a spaz?
edited 10th Jul '11 9:04:15 PM by RedSavant