@Perpetual: Two things:
1. The buffalo seemed to be doing just fine in their camp, and they never even
mentioned the food issue. If they were at a risk for starvation I'm sure they would have brought it up; as is they clearly cared a
lot more about the tradition aspect of it than any practical reason.
2. Explaining the situation is the buffalo's prerogative. The ponies have no clue why the buffalo want them to move, and the buffalo never even attempt to explain. Braeburn explicitly says that they have no idea why the buffalo want the trees gone, which is a failure of communication entirely on the buffalo's part. The ponies couldn't really do anything about the situation, whereas the buffalo could have explained their side but made no effort to, instead choosing to make unprovoked attacks on the town.
Yes, both sides have valid reasons to want the land (I understand that cultural preservation is incredibly important in some societies), but it felt like the buffalo didn't even make a token attempt to inform the ponies what was going on. The conflict would have been greatly improved if the buffalo had attempted to reason with the ponies before jumping straight to plan "Attack the train".
@Librarian: Rarely enough that the ponies were able to build an entire town without the buffalo showing up. I'd guess it's an annual thing.
edited 13th Nov '12 9:43:01 AM by JapaneseTeeth