Heh, that's funny. But I do not think that my supervisor would get the reference, sadly, and it
would weird him out quite a bit...
If you've ever considered the biological implications of two particular ponies of two different types breeding and what their kids might come out like...you might be a Bronie.
If I were to guess, I'd say that the "type" is not really a matter of genetics at all: rather, it depends on environmental factors, a bit like for the case of many eusocial insects.
Perhaps, again as for the case of ants or bees, it depends on nutrition during the larval stage?
* Well, gestation, probably. But we never saw a pregnant pony, in effect...
Or on caste-regulating pheromones, as in termites?
* That could mean, for example, that Princess Celestia secretes a pheromone which prevents other ponies from growing into full alicorns...
It also fits nicely with the "reigning caste"
* Ok, there are two "queens", but that's actually commonplace in many species of termite.
having wings and horns, and the other, more recent specimen being smaller and somewhat "defective" compared to it.
This is definitely
not what would happen if they were variants of a base species: if that were the case, the genetic advantages would spread quickly to the whole population, at least if cross-fertilization is still possible.
Instead, here we seem to have two older, fully developed individuals, and then three castes of smaller, presumably shorter lived, more specialized ones — again, precisely as in the case of social insects.
Plus, it would also explain why male ponies appear to be less common, on average, and also quite a bit more oafish than female ones. If the ponies' gender selection was based on
haplodiploidism
, like that of ants and bees, it would stand to reason that males would be more prone to genetic defects than females...
Confound these ponies, the drive me to overthink!
edited 7th May '11 11:29:06 AM by Carciofus
But they seem to
know where they are going, the ones who walk away from Omelas.