It's not a
total loss as long as it focuses on characterization or otherwise revealing something about the characters and setting. It's when it exists solely to make the characters look awesome that you have a problem.
As for gauging fanfic quality, that's nearly impossible. Especially since it can be a fine line as to whether you give credit to the author for how they utilize the characters and setting, or the original work's author for how they created the characters and setting to begin with. I think fanfic can be good, but comparing it to an original work in terms of quality is almost impossible because they necessarily borrow a lot from the source material.
![[up] [up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png)
To use FE as an example whether or not it's a good work, I can't in good conscience say that it's a good work
solely on it's own merits because it borrows so much from both the MLP and Fallout universes. Fanfic
cannot exist in a vacuum, after all. I think a lot of the issue is that people are going "this is as good as a published original work" when it's really impossible to compare the two. Yes, FE might be an awesome story, but a
lot of that awesomeness comes from the source material. Comparing it to something that the author came up with on their own could look like you're devaluing the effort an author puts into an original work creating everything from scratch.
edited 18th Jun '12 4:41:04 PM by JapaneseTeeth