I'm perfectly fine with planning one's enemy downfall, so long as it neutralizes the threat. I believe it should be appropriate for the situation and one should think in advance whether compassion & kindness necessary for opposing force. Of course more solutions like sabotage there not first planned method anyway. Seriously, I do prefer to
Win Without Fighting and realize out of 4 responses one can have to neutralizing the threat, direct combat and such is the least favored.
And yes, the level is far higher, though root is the same: Someone being malicious to others & causing them harm. One can define it with whatever words they want, the action is the same. One has just gone so far in being malicious that it justifies extreme actions to neutralize threat. Again, the key is neutralizing threat. Whether that means with compassion or freezing them in stone all depends on the situation (And yes, I approve of freezing Discord in stone or blowing up Sombra, merely to neutralize the threat).
It's fun how things are gray like that. I just enjoy mocking saccharine black & white things at time, especially today. Plus whole bullying aesops are starting to get old for me. Not just here, everywhere. I DO think issue needs to be addressed and all, I do believe
He Who Fights Monsters exist, etc. I'm just tired of all the "If you respond at all to a danger, you're automatically as bad as them" things I keep hearing when that is not always the case.
I know THIS time was the case, but it's just an annoying pet peeve of mine at this point.
edited 24th Nov '12 7:31:35 PM by Prime_of_Perfection