What'd they do for the ceremony?
And what makes it even better is that Britain didn't spend a whole bunch of money building special buildings for the Olympics
that will never be used ever again! Unlike China.
Tick Tock, goes the clock/ He cradled and he rocked her/ Tick Tock, goes the clock/Till River kills the Doctor.
Not much just a lot of discussions on the skype side of things.
@The Librarian: They did, however, station massive amounts of military units in London and mount rocket launchers on the roofs of a bunch of apartment buildings. And build an 11 mile long wall around the stadium. And create a massive system of cctv cameras that automatically track people from camera to camera.
Either you two are randomly up late or like me, were watching the Olympic opening ceremonies.
Late? Even in Eastern, it's barely 12:30.
Life is simple: it has no nontrivial normal subgroups.
And what makes it even better is that Britain didn't spend a whole bunch of money building special buildings for the Olympics that will never be used ever again! Unlike China.
You're joking right? Britian wasted over 9 billion pounds on the olympics.
Life is simple: it has no nontrivial normal subgroups.
@JT: Guilty. Cracked is like my morning newspaper.
I usually don't bother checking Cracked more than once or twice a week.
Life is simple: it has no nontrivial normal subgroups.
I only read Cracked when I'm linked to something on there. Then I go on a
Wiki Walk…
Don't give into the pressure of society, just be yourself, be fun, be crazy
I usually just check the recent articles for titles that look interesting.
Life is simple: it has no nontrivial normal subgroups.
I said "Special buildings", story. I said nothing about military units or missile launchers.
Tick Tock, goes the clock/ He cradled and he rocked her/ Tick Tock, goes the clock/Till River kills the Doctor.
I'm pretty sure the Velodrome counts as a special building.
Life is simple: it has no nontrivial normal subgroups.
That's been there for years, though. And they still
use it.
Unless you don't mean that white building with the yellow things on it down by the Thames.
edited 27th Jul '12 9:41:59 PM by theLibrarian
Tick Tock, goes the clock/ He cradled and he rocked her/ Tick Tock, goes the clock/Till River kills the Doctor.
I mean the new thing in Olympic Park. Which was specifically built for the 2012 Olympics. The total government budget for the 2012 Olympics is $14.5 billion though I can't find a breakdown on how much of that was spent on buildings, security, etc.
Anyway, it's a shame that the Olympic committee always forces hosts to build shiny new facilities since it guarantees they'll make a loss on the games.
edited 27th Jul '12 9:46:01 PM by storyyeller
Life is simple: it has no nontrivial normal subgroups.
Yeah, the buildings need to be utilitarian enough that they can still be used afterwards. Like buildings for the swimming events can be used as just a regular public pool after the games are over.
Tick Tock, goes the clock/ He cradled and he rocked her/ Tick Tock, goes the clock/Till River kills the Doctor.
…Okay, the Queen skydiving with Daniel Craig was pretty cool
Don't give into the pressure of society, just be yourself, be fun, be crazy
I keep reading Velodrome as "Velcrodome".
Pronounced "Sid-zellia"
What are you looking at?
I just watched the clip of Rowan Atkinson at the Olypmics, and it was hilarious!
Life is simple: it has no nontrivial normal subgroups.
Yeah, the buildings need to be utilitarian enough that they can still be used afterwards. Like buildings for the swimming events can be used as just a regular public pool after the games are over.
Yes but it's far from the most efficient way to build a swimming pool. Just think of how many community swimming pools that 14.5$ billion could have bought. The fact is that the Olympics are invariably a money loser for the host government in modern times.
Life is simple: it has no nontrivial normal subgroups.