Fanservice. There is no porn allowed on tv tropes period.

I'm trying too, but I don't think I'm fully understanding what you are saying... :(

edited 16th Jan '12 11:46:16 AM by Cookoo

Here! Have a change of subject: Grand Galloping Gala Humanziations

@ Ginger, I got ninja'd. That post was supposed to be one further up the queue.

Fanservice is funny. One of the cardinal rules of sitcoms, for example, is that any character who says the word "nipple" will automatically get a laugh. And the rediculousneoss of FI Mservice just makes it even more funny for me.

Oh god damn that fashion. Now THAT is how you design a dress!

Too bad the character designs freak me out

@CDRW heaven forbid the fanservice actually be... sexy! XD

edited 16th Jan '12 11:50:11 AM by gingerninja666

@ L Mage

I remember seeing them ages ago...I really like them.

For me, it's 75-25 funny/sexy.

edited 16th Jan '12 11:50:07 AM by ApplelightLimited

@ L Mage

Impressive dresses, but I'm not sure on the actual humanised ponies though. (Luna is especially not like how I would imagine her)

edited 16th Jan '12 11:49:58 AM by Cookoo

That's bullshit and you know it!

I think Fluttershy's is the best...I wish we could see it from the front.

Pinkie's too thin...FS is too 'big'...AJ ain't tough looking enough...but they are good.

<<

>>

She's...nice.

edited 16th Jan '12 11:51:55 AM by ApplelightLimited

I just found humanized Gilda on Cracked.com!

Yeah, the people are pretty generic, but dem clothing. Clothing makes a character half the time, y'know...

Ah, yes, much better bodies

Different noses, different chins, this is a keeper.

edited 16th Jan '12 11:52:44 AM by MrAHR

...

Not sure what to say to that.

I'm ceartain theres a trope for that.

edited 16th Jan '12 11:52:25 AM by LMage

... That's a guy... OH! Oh, I see what you did there.

edited 16th Jan '12 11:52:50 AM by nomuru2d

Whatever happened to: "EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF A CHARACTER HAS TO BE UNIQUE?"... hypocrite

clothing doesn't interest me

edited 16th Jan '12 11:53:44 AM by gingerninja666

Ginger confirmed for nudist.

They should. I'm not being a hypocrite, I'm taking what I see to be an overwhelming quality, and thus willing to overlook the flaws, so I may enjoy the picture for what it is. It's not perfect, but I can still enjoy something with flaws.

Clothing interests me if it looks awesome on a cute girl.

As in, I care about it if I see it, but I don't bother judging it, nor do I have any particular preference.

... ugh, fashion

I don't see what's so great about the dresses

edited 16th Jan '12 11:57:18 AM by gingerninja666

Clothes can really make the character look their best.

@ AHR

Now I like those!

edited 16th Jan '12 11:57:56 AM by ApplelightLimited

I took a history of fashion class, and I desire to design interesting looking characters. People who wave off fashion as superficial simply don't understand the history it has. Can it be superficial? Sure. Most things are. But is it inherently superficial? Hell naw.

I just don't understand fashion a lot of the time... it all looks the same as the next peice over to me or it's so outlandish it's more a costume then anything else (like half the stuff on Project Runway)

Ginger: Because clothes can make or break the entire image of a person.

I hate to bash on Mousa, but compare Rarity's outfit in the fancy one or the normal one, to his Original humanization of Rarity.

The dress just simply does not look like something fancy. It lacks proper balancing. That's why he later added that belt thing, which set it off a lot better.

Now, if you REALLY want to get into what makes an outfit good check this entry out

Clothing is a HUGE part of the art process. While it's important to make everything else unique as well, clothing is not nearly as limited like skin and structures are. The possibilities are nearly limitless and can easily set the entire tone for your story all by itself.

I just don't care for it... in ANY way.

and now everyone;s gonna say I'm WRONG