@Seraphem: That's true, but still, leaving a hole in the story and then retconning in an answer later isn't really a great storytelling method. It can work if you want intentional ambiguity, but I'm not sure that that was the case here.
I read the second book and when I was done I felt like very little had happened, and I had no idea what had caused anything.
I don't remember anything much from the second book. The third book is actually a lot more interesting, at least towards the end where Leto turns into a Human Sandworm.
Life is simple: it has no nontrivial normal subgroups.
Planning is more excusable if you have Super Prescience.
Life is simple: it has no nontrivial normal subgroups.
The first one was definitely the best.
Life is simple: it has no nontrivial normal subgroups.
@Seraph Really? What in the world were the chances of that? If the author wanted to write about it, she would have written about it. Otherwise, if she seriously intended the readers to read porn to get the point, then there are even more serious issues here.
Eh i don't see it as a hole either way. not stating a characters motivation == them not existing. yeah not great stroytelling to do so unless there's a reason you need to keep it secret, but not a plot hole unless not knowing it makes something not makes sense compared to their other actions.
Build a fool proof system, and the world will create a better fool.
My random thoughts
@ Lurker, given the the important Character parts are written separately from the porn parts, not hard to just edit those paragraphs out and keep the important stuff. And either way, like i said, not learning Homages motivations for a relationship with Pip was never a plot hole to begin with. bad writing, possibly, plot hole no.
Build a fool proof system, and the world will create a better fool.
My random thoughts
Well I think the bigger problem is that it runs on
Unspoken Plan Garuentee. The
characters always know what's going to happen but it isn't revealed until the end.
Life is simple: it has no nontrivial normal subgroups.
I never read more than a few chapters. I'm starting to think that might have been a good thing, given where this conversation seems to be heading.
I came, I saw, a small member of the family Equus ferus caballus
I have to admit the Baron was absolutely hilarious in how large of a ham he was. I wish all the characters were that ridiculous.
@ Veni you're missing out, yeah we squabble about the little things with FOE but overall it is a great story, yes it has some issues and could use a professional editor to give it a once over, but the core of the story is amazing. And the early chapters really are the worse, it gets MUCH better quickly after chapter 5-6 and just keeps growing from there
Build a fool proof system, and the world will create a better fool.
My random thoughts