It's not like what she did actually hurt them, apart from possible pyschological harm, and that's like urinating in the ocean.
If there is anything that you are alone in thinking, it's "thinking that you're alone in thinking of your theories".
@Mio Yes. I enjoy villains because they're entertaining, not because they're evil. I find their evil entertaining but the physical ACT of being evil isn't what I like.
"Contests fought between two masters are decided instantly. An invisible battle is now raging between the two of them." Lulu vs Schneizel
@story NEVER. FUCKING.
FORGIVING HER
She would have condemned a potentially ENDLESS number of ponies to a punishment that she inflicted only on those she THOUGHT were to blame for everything. How petty and spiteful is that?
"Contests fought between two masters are decided instantly. An invisible battle is now raging between the two of them." Lulu vs Schneizel
So where's my cookie? I'm actually surprised that noone else answered before me.
If there is anything that you are alone in thinking, it's "thinking that you're alone in thinking of your theories".
You can have this cookie.
@Kyler I laughed at ASOIAF when a 5 year old got his head smashed in with a mace.
I laughed, not because I thought the death of that child was funny, but because it was abrupt, and the people commiting it were SUPPOSED to Complete Monsters and unrepentent assholes. It didn't EXPECT me to sympathize with them.
God, it's hard to explain. I know what it is, I just can't articulate it properly
kinda what Mio said
edited 6th May '12 7:15:34 PM by gingerninja666
"Contests fought between two masters are decided instantly. An invisible battle is now raging between the two of them." Lulu vs Schneizel
Because when a villain does something wrong, you know it's wrong. It's when you don't know that it's wrong, when the story says that maybe this wrong thing is right, it's a bit of a trickier issue? I mean, it's just because you were supposed to agree with Scoots, right?(Bearing in mind I have no idea what's goingo n, I'm just making guesses based on what I know of Ginger)
oh great Ginger raging about Stable 1 again....
Build a fool proof system, and the world will create a better fool.
@Kegi because ultimately, Scootaloo was treated as a force for good. It expected us to like and to smpathize with her (she even becomes kind of a role model for Pip)
Evil doing Evil, I an comprehend and enjoy. Evil doing good, I can get behind too.
Good doing evil I just can't accept unless they're punished SEVERELY for it. Scoots died eventuall but she wasn't PUNISHED or called out on what she did. She didn't think she was wrong. Her death would've happened whether she'd done it or not.
"Contests fought between two masters are decided instantly. An invisible battle is now raging between the two of them." Lulu vs Schneizel
@kegi She locked up all the ponies she PERSONALLY blamed for the war and said she'd keep them there and that none of them would be let out... ever. Even if the surface turned back to normal the stable would remain locked. The doors of that stable would never open until every soul there was dead (and bear in mind she was expecting the nigh-immortal goddesses to be in there too)
All as a petty, pointless act of revenge.
edited 6th May '12 7:29:30 PM by gingerninja666
"Contests fought between two masters are decided instantly. An invisible battle is now raging between the two of them." Lulu vs Schneizel
I don't normally agree with Ginger when it comes to antagonistic characters, but even I thought what Scootaloo did was kind of a douchebag move.
Spooky.