There's also Philossbelle now, too.
Not to try and fan the fire if the conversation has passed, but for my two cents about Social Justice Bloggers: While I kind of agree with their intent, I disagree with their methods. Nothing bothers me more than someone who whines about how terrible something is, but does
nothing to stop it. I admire the SJB's desire to enact change, at the very least.
That said, you don't HAVE to be a dick about it. I actually follow a LGBTQ humour blog, and the mod is kinda slowly morphing into a SBJ, largely by being an enormous dick to people who dare to imply s/he might dislike straight people or allies. While I agree with his/her point that a lot of allies don't actually have our best interests at heart and/or feel entitled to cookies for basically being good people, and there's certainly valid reason to dislike one's oppressors, it's important to recognize the allies who
are genuinely trying to help and equally to recognize that, while 'heterophobia' is never going to become entrenched and institutionalized, blanketly hating all straight people for the sins of some is the shit isms are made of.
In general, assuming that everyone on the opposite side of whatever issue you have - gay marriage, abortion, rape culture(Not rapists themselves, mind, but unsuspecting people who have simply been raised into an admittedly fucked up culture) are willfully ignorant, stupid or even evil, is a great way to
never get anything done. Being abrasive is going to get your [debate]opponent to dismiss your argument out of turn where they
might be convinced, and moreover it's going to make an undecided observer, who are ultimately the
most important people in a debate, to associate your side of the argument with a huge dick, and so they're far more likely to go to the other side.